
Obama recently imbibed a pint of Guinness in Ireland, which gave the right-wing media another thing to bitch about. You know, if I heard that 100+ of my constituents were dead, I’d have a fucking pint too.
I’m not here to talk politics, though. In conjunction with Obama’s mocking-the-dead-by-not-being-in-the-exact-place-they-were-when-they-died, Slate ran this article: http://www.slate.com/id/2295487/.
It pissed me off. Not because it’s inaccurate – in fact, it cleared up some misconceptions I had, like that Guinness draught is brewed in Canada (it’s not. It’s all brewed in Dublin). Not because it didn’t make sense – it did. After all, beer that travels 20 miles is going to taste better than beer that travels 3,000. That’s fair. And it’s not even that I disagree – though their test was obviously biased (what kind of beer expert is going to say he prefers the Guinness in America? That’s like saying you prefer the Coca-Cola in Europe…oh wait, Coca-Cola is better everywhere else in the world that’s not America including Mexico yes there is actually an instance in which one would say I wish I were in Mexico instead of America and that instance is when one is drinking Coca-Cola. Sorry Mexico I know you’re going through a rough patch and I shouldn’t make fun of you and I’m sure there are other instances in which one would prefer to be in Mexico over America; for example if one wanted to be beheaded. Dammit sorry I did it again).
Back to Guinness. The reason this pisses me off is because it’s just begging for more culturally retarded American tourists to come back from a trip to Ireland, sit with their friends at their local bar, order a Guinness, take one sip and say: “You know, the Guinness really is better in Ireland.” I hate this because it’s such a fucking cliché, up there with “You know, swimming is the best form of exercise”; one of those things that everyone’s heard one thousand times before and will hear one thousand times again before they die. And the speaker – the cliché dispenser – has no conception of whether or not that’s true. Ten-to-one they couldn’t taste any difference between the two, but they either fooled themselves into thinking they could or they just no know one’s going to disagree with them.
When I went to Dublin, I got off the airport bus, walked into the first pub I saw and ordered a Guinness. It was bar none the worst Guinness I have ever had. It was completely flat, it had none of that renowned Guinness head), and it smelled like a horse. I drank it because I was in fucking Ireland. I left disappointed and went to another bar that was more touristy but poured a much tastier Guinness.
My point is that lots of people went to that right-off-the-airport-bus pub, and lots of them had vomit-inducing Guinness. And lots of them went back home and told their friends the Guinness was better in Ireland.
While I’m ranting, let me say one other thing: Guinness is kind of a shitty beer. I’m a little ashamed to admit this, because considering that it’s a mass-produced product of a massive beverage conglomerate it weirdly gets a pass from most beer lovers. I think this because a) everybody loves Irish people, b) it was many people’s first beer that had any kind of flavor at all, and c) everyone loves doing car bombs. But drinking it now I realize that it’s basically the blandest stout in existence, and it has a helluva lot of body for what’s essentially no flavor. It pours well – I’ll give it that. And, of course, it makes a great sound when it’s opened.